语义分析的机会与挑战

Start with sources.

Text analytics has had great success in areas such as mining biomedical literature as part of drug-discovery processes. If we can understand the relationship between certain protein interactions and disease onset, we can begin to identify promising therapies. Text analytics can help us achieve this understanding without costly and time-consuming clinical trials. We mine for factual information, yet accuracy of information extraction from formally written scientific literature as measured by precision and recall – by levels of correctness and exhaustiveness – typically reaches the 85%-90% range. 数据挖掘实验室

Opinions are far harder than facts to describe. Opinion sources are typically informally written (or worse) and highly diverse. They are short on descriptive metadata that can provide context for analytical efforts. So sentiment-extraction accuracy is typically far lower, but it can be boosted by approaches that are appropriate for the sources and goals.

We might start by classifying source documents – Web pages, e-mail messages, news or blog articles, or audio transcripts – by theme, topic, type, authorship, and other characteristics. To this end, we parse documents for entities such as names of persons, products, companies, and places; for descriptive attributes such as authorship; and also for abstract concepts. For example, the concept “vehicle” subsumes entities are names of makes and models with year and style attributes. Taxonomies can help in the classification effort but they may be incomplete when dealing with truly diverse sources. 数据挖掘交友

Entity extraction gives us subject matter for further investigation. But beyond facts – “I bought my first Mac last year” – what was the writer or speaker trying to communicate?

According to researchers Livia Polanyi and Annie Zaenen, “The most salient clues about attitude are provided by the lexical choice of the writer, ... but the organization of the text also contributes information relevant to assessing attitude.” Lexical choices: those are words. Boost, benefit, and brave indicate positive valence – that is, tone or polarity – while

上一页 1 23 4 5 6 下一页
[数据挖掘专家] [数据挖掘研究院] [数据挖掘论坛] [数据挖掘实验室]
上一篇:BI搜索与文本分析
下一篇:焦点应用:语义分析
最新评论共有 0 位网友发表了评论 , 查看所有评论
发表评论( 不能超过250字,需审核,请自觉遵守互联网相关政策法规。 )
匿名?
数据挖掘网站导航 数据挖掘论坛导航
  • 数据挖掘工具
  • 数据挖掘论坛
  • DataCruncher - Cognos
  • MineSet - MathSoft
  • Intelligent Miner - GainSmarts
  • Sqlserver - SAS - Clementine
  • CART - Weka - WizSoft
  • NeuroShell - ModelQuest
  • data mining tools - Darwin
  • 数据挖掘交友
  • 数据挖掘博客
  • 数据挖掘工具
  • 数据挖掘资源
  • 数据挖掘技术算法
  • 数据挖掘相关期刊、会议
  • 研究院联盟合作专区
  • 数据挖掘基础与相关技术
  • 数据挖掘厂商与就业
  • 数据挖掘研究者乐园
  • 知名厂商数据挖掘工具资料
  • 国内数据挖掘实验室
  • Foreign Data Mining Lab
  • 热点关注
  • 文本聚类程序实例
  • BBS 数据挖掘研究及其地位与核心问题
  • 一种新的基于统计的自动文本分类方法
  • Text Categorization
  • Is Data Mining Misguided?
  • 焦点应用:语义分析
  • 句子相似度计算在FAQ中的应用
  • 文本挖掘抢占商业智能掘金制高点
  • 基于文本概念和kNN 的跨语种文本过滤
  • More data isn’t always a good thing in
  • 论坛最新话题
  • Foundations of Statistical Natural Langu
  • Game Theory meet Data Mining: A Recent P
  • System Building: How does it help or hin
  • 数据挖掘与Clementine培训
  • 新手报到
  • 求 SASEM 客户流失预测分析
  • 数据挖掘工程师/搜索研究院—北京——无线
  • 数据挖掘入门介绍(如何着手数据挖掘)
  • Information Overload Survey Results
  • The INEX 2005 Workshop on Element Retrie
  • 相关资讯
  • More data isn’t always a good thing in
  • Text Categorization
  • Finding Advertising Keywords on Web Page
  • Communities from Seed Sets
  • To Randomize or Not To Randomize: Space
  • Overview of Text Summarization History
  • Porter Stemming Algorithm
  • Sequential Minimal Optimization
  • 句子相似度计算在FAQ中的应用
  • 弱指导的统计隐含语义分析及其在跨语言信息
  • 数据挖掘实验室资料
  • 数据挖掘博客地址
  • 数据挖掘实验室网站地址
  • Prepare for Medicare audits by using dat
  • 注册成为SAS用户与爱好者俱乐部会员
  • 水南梅
  • 明日烟
  • 新人报道
  • 下载
  • 厦门服务器托管,450元/月—0592-5177319 高
  • 买空间送域名--0592-5177319 高静